 | | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) but (...) Lego's contract with SW ends in 2007. I'm inclined to agree, I love the SW line but I wish Lego hadn't sold their soul to Hollywood like so many other toy companies. (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) Yes he is 12, but he is not your average slap happy 12 year old... Build on... Robin Werner GFLTC/GFLUG (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) I'd LOVE to see a MIB as a set. I worry that they may not have the tooling for the linear actuator (rack) parts though. (in this set they are the parts that provide the linear motion that opens and closes the large base halves) This URL should (...) (23 years ago, 10-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) Hopefully, the contract should expire in 2003.And if it does, prepare yourself for a Space Legend set. Personally, I want to see either Cosmic Fleet Voyager, 918 Space Transport or a good old Message Intercept Base as Space legends. Or even (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) I don't exactly know the answer to that officially...I'm assuming that they got a 9 year (3 film) license considering that they are issuing out models for Star Wars II: Attack of the Clones. That is my best guess. You are right classic space (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) I have to agree with you. Redemption is sweet.:-) Anyway, speaking of liscences- when does Lego's contract about Star Wars expire? I would much rather see classic space and Blacktron than the current new Star Wars sets. John Kruer (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) It's kind of funny how the newer generation of kids (action addicted) don't appreciate Lego's core values. Sets with high ratios of specialty parts appeal to them, while basic models, such as Castle and Space don't appeal at all. It's quite (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) Heres a link that has my picture: (URL) have to use my moms name because of the Child Protection Act that dosn't let me give out personal information. Also, email Robin Werner. I was present at the GATS 2002 Jacksonville display. I think Robin (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
The initial post has some decent points. I guess the Star Wars licence payed off for Lego (we'll never know since it's a private company) but when I first heard how much they paid for it I was aghast. Wasn't it something like $50 million or $100 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Time to write Lego Consumer Affairs a (nasty) letter..
|
|
(...) Thank you, Jude (I am gifted) John Kruer (23 years ago, 9-Mar-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
