Subject:
|
Re: Jake's To-do list
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 May 2004 19:09:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3006 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Mark Bellis wrote:
| |
We need to know:
2. Why the chosen new colours are less realistic than the old ones, and indeed
debatably incompatible?
|
Maybe this is just me, but how are the new colors “less realistic”? Realism is
in the eye and imagination of the builder - we lived with yellow “skinned”
minifigs for many years; now people are complaining about the new, “more
realistic” skin tones. Not the same as the old ones, yes; less realistic, no.
James Wilson
Dallas, TX
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Jake's To-do list
|
| (...) Old brown = wood New brown = chocolate A lot more real things are wood brown than chocolate brown. We're not all going to make Lego chocolate bars! Of the three new colours, new light grey is IMHO the easiest to adapt to. It doesn't make (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Jake's To-do list
|
| (...) We need to know: 1. Why old greys and brown needed to be changed in the first place? 2. Why the chosen new colours are less realistic than the old ones, and indeed debatably incompatible? 3. What are the economics of the change for the (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
