| |
In lugnet.harrypotter, Richard Marchetti writes:
> ...and let's face it, the product line to have latched onto was "Lord of the
> Rings." I happen to never have read these LOTR books, but I gather they are
> quite good and the film previews I have seen look epic. HP will just be
> some Disney-esque drivel shoved down everyone's throat until we will want to
> just puke our guts out. LOTR I think has the possibility of truly creating
> a sense of wonder in its audience as it taps into more deeply rooted
> archetypal material.
Lord of the Rings LEGO isn't going to happen. New Line Cinema has awarded
the construction toys license to Playmates Toys(1), which I find really
baffling, since they don't have squat to do with construction toys, but such
is life.
I'm planning on making my own darn LotR LEGO.
thanks,
James
(FUT set to general becuase I'm really not sure where discussion about LEGO
licenses should go...)
1: http://www.playmatestoys.com/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 4707 Hagrid's Hut complaints....
|
| (...) If this is true this is the first I have heard of it. While there do seem to be some new elements, I am very wary of the arguement that having to make new elements is some kind of deal maker or breaker on set design for TLC -- I have said it (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
