 | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | I wouldn't hold your breath for traditional minifigs for Harry Potter. The demographic is younger folks. Take a look at Max in the new Creator line: (URL) that tousled hair, just print some glasses on the face and you have everyones favorite (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | (...) I do believe that it was already 'confirmed' that Harry Potter will be in Minifig scale! -R (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | (...) I've been toying (no pun) with the images at LEGO to try to get the scale of the new figs. The seem to be the same 4 brick/1 plate height as the traditional figs, just with more detail (2 stud feet, sculpted ball socket heads, etc.). Dryden (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | Matthew Gerber wrote in message ... (...) scale of (...) socket (...) all (...) the new (...) The new figs are 5 1/2 bricks high (I'm holding one in my hand). They are all solidly attached, no parts are removable. Hair is stuck to head, head to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | (...) ~~Hello?????? Did a really quick monkey run around and bite everyone in the eye when I posted. Cause it appears as though nobody saw my statement. “Confirmed” Minifig… means confirmed Minifig. I don’t recall exactly where I read it, but either (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | OOOHHHHHHH... " 'confirmed' "! Sorry, I didn't know that 'confirmed' meant gospel truth...truly, very sorry about that. I took a couple of minutes to trace the posts I believe you are referring to. Excerpts include: "Fortunately, someone posted a (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | (...) Die Harry-Potter-Figuren sollen MINIFIGS sein, keine Creator- oder Belville-Figuren which means "The Harry Potter Figures shall be minifigs, no Creator- or Belville figures." The implication is shall in the English 'will' sense, not the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | | judging from the pictures that were mysteriously put on-line..... "not affiliated" with JK Rowlings or with movie producers... I'd say the robes look more like school blazers with house crests on the chest...that's my take on the situation. (24 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: minifigures in robes? —Aaron West
|
| | | | (...) Yes, I remember the offical LEGO/TLC announcement from New York Toyfare news stuff that plants Potter as a solid minifigure of standard LEFO ilk. And, yes, there is a monkey around here somewhere... Doh! They're sorted with my beasts and (...) (24 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| | | | |
