Subject:
|
Re: Speed?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Oct 1998 17:52:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDMnomorespam.ORG
|
Viewed:
|
1446 times
|
| |
|
|
Alex Wetmore <alex@phred.org> wrote:
> This wouldn't change any of the control that Todd has over the groups. As
> far as lugnet is concerned the caching server just looks like another client
> and has the same control and properties as any other client on the system.
Right, but as it is Todd has some little bit of control -- and can log --
who posts and reads. And since this _is_ his project, I assume he wants to
keep that. (Certainly helps with the spam problem.) Otherwise, why not
export lugnet.* to all of usenet? Most servers these days pick up any
hierarchy they can.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Speed?
|
| Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) client (...) Some people (at least myself) are reading the news through a proxy/caching server though, so his logs aren't going to be 100% correct. He knows this in my case, since I was one of the people who (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Speed?
|
| Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) The easiest way for this to occur wouldn't require any work on Todd's part at all. Someone in Europe could install a caching NNTP server (such as nntpcache or dnews) and set up lugnet as a parent server. The (...) (26 years ago, 5-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
