Subject:
|
Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:10:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11482 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Allan Johansen wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Michael Shiels wrote:
> > YES but LEGO wouldn't be around if they don't make some profits right? How
> > at production cost would they survive.
>
> I didnt say that they should stop selling the normal sets. I just asked for
> an additional service above and beyond that...
>
> But of course you have a point regarding the need for profit. Perhaps such
> an offer should be available only to certain clubs in order to limit the
> impact on the market? Or something like that...
I think that's not quite the point that was being made. The point is that
selling individual bricks to individual consumers is *grossly* more expensive
for the company, not that it's cheaper, and hence would need to sell sets to
keep their profits. That's why if you build a "set" out of Pick-A-Brick online,
you'll find that it's far more expensive than buying the same set at retail. If
that weren't true, you'd probably see the prices be roughly comparable.
> In my experience, Pick-a-Brick, and by extension the LEGO Factory, are
> crazily expensive compared to Bricklink. When I build a model in LDD I
> usually end up buying the bricks through Bricklink, thus cutting the price
> in half...
>
> But perhaps its just me having a love for the wrong bricks...?
Bingo.
You want bricks A, B, and C in mass quantities in colors 1, 2 and 3, and someone
else wants D, E, and F in colors 2, 9, and 12. All told, that would mean Lego
couldn't predict what you were going to want in the future, and would have to
stock tons extra, or would have to do incredibly short runs of parts (on-demand)
making the cost per brick in the hundreds or even thousands of dollars. You
simply can't set up a series of injection molding machines to run for a
particular part and color only to make a thousand parts or so. Each individual
element costs next to nothing, but the overhead in setting up the run to go
smoothly is very large. So they set up the run, and let it go for a few hours or
days or what-have-you, and get a few hundred thousand or maybe even a few
million parts, and presto, your setup cost is balanced out.
If everyone wanted the exact same elements in large quantities, we'd have no
problem. But you need such a variety that it's simply not even close to being
feasible.
> > I'd love it if I could request custom runs of parts in the colors I choose,
> > and I'm sure if I could purchase enough to make it economical, TLG would
> > probably do it
>
> Would they? Maybe...
Probably. But I expect we'd be talking in the millions in order for them to
start paying attention. Maybe once you got into the hundreds of thousands of
dollars, they'd start listening. Anyway, suffice to say that yes, if you could
afford it, yes, it would be economical for Lego, and they'd do it. If I said I'd
pay 100 billion dollars for a run of 10,000 old gray monorail tracks, they'd
FIND a way to make it happen. But that happy medium between "reasonable for me"
and "economical for Lego" is still unreachable on both sides.
> In truth, Im not entirely convinced. As has already been pointed out, TLC
> seems to have been somewhat slow when it comes to dealing with AFOLs.
> Perhaps its not a question of whether or not theres a profit to be made,
> but rather the simple fact that they havent thought about it? Or, at least,
> havent figured out how to do it in a viable, and profitable, way...?
They've certainly thought about it-- but to date, the feasibility isn't there.
As hinted earlier, the cost is in the overhead of setting up a production run of
a particular part/color combination. As it stands, there's a lot of stuff
involved in doing that. It takes time, manpower, and resources, because (as I
understand) they run the line, test the bricks, tweak things, run it again, test
the bricks, tweak again, run again, test the bricks, find out everything's good
to go, and finally run it for production. I don't know how much time and
resource that all takes, but I know it's a lot.
If there were a way to manufacture bricks WITHOUT that overhead (IE, not
injection molding, or a way to guarantee consistency without testing, and
automate setup quickly), then yes, this could be done such that it might be cost
effective (though probably still more expensive!) for AFOLs to buy.
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO
|
| (...) I didnt say that they should stop selling the normal sets. I just asked for an additional service above and beyond that... But of course you have a point regarding the need for profit. Perhaps such an offer should be available only to certain (...) (16 years ago, 17-Sep-08, to lugnet.general)
|
63 Messages in This Thread: ![Improving the adult image of LEGO -Scott Wardlaw (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.ambassadors, lugnet.lego, lugnet.announce, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Timothy Gould (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Nathan Todd (18-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Tommy Armstrong (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Gregory (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Laswell (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Dave Schuler (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Eaton (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Ted Godwin (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -John P. Henderson (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Adrian Egli (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Dave Sterling (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Tim David (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Richie Dulin (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Tommy Armstrong (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -John P. Henderson (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Allan Johansen (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Laswell (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Eaton (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Dave Sterling (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Allan Johansen (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Michael Shiels (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Brian Davis (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Allan Johansen (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Laswell (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Brian Davis (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Mike Walsh (18-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Laswell (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Paul Sinasohn (18-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Mike Walsh (18-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Laswell (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Richie Dulin (18-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Nathan Todd (18-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Eaton (18-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Brendan Mauro (14-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Scott Lyttle (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Elroy Davis (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Jeffrey Findley (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -John P. Henderson (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Duane Collicott (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Anders Isaksson (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -William Webb (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Warren Nagel (15-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Allister McLaren (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Scott Wardlaw (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Allister McLaren (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Allister McLaren (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -William R. Ward (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Dave Sterling (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Steve Bliss (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Frank Filz (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Allister McLaren (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Allister McLaren (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Stump Dunn (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Duane Collicott (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Bob Parker (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Scott Wardlaw (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Richie Dulin (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Richie Dulin (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Magnus Lauglo (16-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -David Stannard (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Improving the adult image of LEGO -Karl Paulsen (17-Sep-08 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|