Subject:
|
Re: Old LEGO and LEGO with holes in studs.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:08:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
383 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, John P. Henderson writes:
> In lugnet.general, Thomas Dickson writes:
> > I am bored today. Whilst sorting my LEGO collection, I started wondering
> > what decides which parts will have holes in the studs? For example, a
> > standard 2x2 brick has no holes in its studs, but all technic bricks do.
>
> Interesting question. I have never given it much thought. It does allow
> one to better identify technic elements when mixed with normal ones. Anyone
> else have any idea?
>
> > I also found a 2x2 block that has PAT PEND printed on the inside. That would
> > be from the early 60's, right?
>
> My first guess is that would be from the Samsonite error (assuming you are
> in North America) when TLC licensed Samsonite plastics to manufacture early
> sets in the US. And yes, I think that was in the 1960's.
Samsonite Error? I think it was not an error, but a good decision. GRIN.
(yes, I know he meant Samsonite Era... :-) )
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Old LEGO and LEGO with holes in studs.
|
| (...) Interesting question. I have never given it much thought. It does allow one to better identify technic elements when mixed with normal ones. Anyone else have any idea? (...) My first guess is that would be from the Samsonite error (assuming (...) (22 years ago, 4-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
