 | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Ya ya, whatever. Now people are gonna go off and think I was wrong about something, Larritarianism will fade away as just another historical footnote, and it'll all be your fault. :-) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | | | (...) Originally, my post mentioned how 'Uncle Lare' had made a mistake; but I TRIED to deflect that fact by editing that out and hoping no-one would notice. ---- I was TRYING <sniff> to keep the dream uh-uh-aLIVE; but -- but YOU <sob> (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) And so the facade cracks........ -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Whoa there, Nostradamus, not so fast. Why do you think God invented duct [1] tape;-) [1] Using the word"duck" to describe the tape, of course, would lead to the *dreaded* <cue reverb> Traademark diluution...'-) [2] [2] Oh, never mind me, I was (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) "double-plus good 99-5-3, LL speech: 1 error verified; corrected..." Wrong? Larry? Couldn't be. Steve (I have no idea what LL would stand for, but it looked more like BB than LP did.) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) As the Larritarians all know, the Larry is never wrong. It's obviously clear he was speaking of a currently unknown future set numbered 6339. Such utterances are often made seemingly in passing but come to pass nonetheless. Which is awesome (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Well, Tom, I'd amend this statement. Larry *was* wrong once... that was the time he *thought* he was wrong;-) [1] [1] that reminds me of my favorite story dilemma about the two guards and the two doors. Biters? -John (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) NO!! Say it isn't so! :( But you'll note he (purportedly) erred on the side of caution, and that is to be taken under consideration. So has there been any progress on firmly establishing the Larritarian rules for polygamy? :) (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | *CAUTION* PUN AHEAD —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) The more the Marry her! ;-) (...) Ouch! (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) What? Sometimes The Larry will declare that you must play with more than one set at a time? I know this might shock some, but I've always been up for that. Some sets are really good at interfacing pleasantly with others for your enjoyment. (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) c /must/can/ * * < (1) > Larritarianism is about freedom, not strictness :-) (...) Yes. Indeed. I just built a doodlebug and it has a Naboo Fighter contributed engine in the engine compartment. GMLTC members will see it later tonite. Everyone (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Super LarryPad 4.01 beta 3 build 1138? --Todd (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I mean a real editor released by a real company. As a hint, this editor has well over 1 million users, at least 80% of which have no idea they're actually using it. (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm... Must be a Big Blue thing, eh? Umm, does it spot inside another application? -- is that how people don't know that they're spotning it? What kind of text data does it typically operate on? Is it special purpose? Does it spot on PCs or (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) You've got 14 questions left, but you've neglected to ask if it's a animal, plant, or mineral. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | 20Q (was Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Yes. (...) ?? Rephrase the question, what do you mean by "spot"? (...) ?? Rephrase the question, what do you mean by "spot"? (or SpotN in this case) (...) We won't hold you to "yes/no" questions! All kinds (...) No (...) ?? Rephrase the (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 20Q (was Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Oh. Sorry. c /spot/run/ * * --Todd (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 20Q (was Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Ohmigawd, I can't believe I walked into that! A classic shaggy dog if there ever was one. (in more ways than one, so to speak :-)) But isn't that a pun and thus offtopic for .fun and thus subject to needing to be crossposted to .pun? Or don't (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 20Q (was Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I guess it's kind-of a pun. No, all puns don't necessarily have to be force-crossposted to the .pun group. --Todd (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
