Subject:
|
Re: Surprisingly High Traffic
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:34:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
810 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Blake Kunisch writes:
> Unfortunately, the idiotic way the people at Geocities do it (AFAIK), is
> that they determine how much bandwidth PER HOUR you are allowed to use,
> based on how much you are given per month. So if you have one bad hour,
> despite having previous slow hours, you are out of luck. I think a better
> way to do it would be per day, rather than per hour, that way slow hours
> could offset heavy hours, but I guess there's pros and cons of each
> way. Good luck with your hosting nonetheless.
>
> =Blake=
Per day updates would be a LOT better than on a hourly basis. The one thing
I don't understand I why they have to shut down the site after many slow
hours, in spite of one fast hour. What's up with that, anyway?
Maybe It's all just a scam to get people to switch to their paid hosting
service? :) Just a thought!
Just my two brickz...
<<_Matt Hein_>>
Lugnet member No. 1112
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic
|
| (...) It's just a Yahoo! plow! Whatever you do don't bother paying for the extra service. Screw them! You can set up a mirror site at www.tripod.com to help offset your "this site is out...". I've had this problem before with yahoo and finally just (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Surprisingly High Traffic
|
| (...) Unfortunately, the idiotic way the people at Geocities do it (AFAIK), is that they determine how much bandwidth PER HOUR you are allowed to use, based on how much you are given per month. So if you have one bad hour, despite having previous (...) (22 years ago, 26-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
