 | | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
In lugnet.general, Joel Kuester writes: <Heavily snipped> (...) True enough. Since this is essentially a site whose content is driven by its users, then change should be anything that any of us can imagine. (...) Well, since I'm a person who's (...) (23 years ago, 4-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
(...) One of the more untapped ideas I think we could try and play with more is to think of it more as a database, and bring those aspects forward, like what Jon Palmer did with .space discussions on his Galactic Shipyard. I thought that was a great (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
(...) by (...) to (...) what (...) thought (...) major (...) unless (...) I think that's a great idea, and the curators of various themes should indeed keep such links active on the theme page. :) Dan (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
Dan Boger wrote in message <200111050436.fA54aM...on.com>... (...) So have curators been appointed for some/all themes? Kevin ---...--- Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (URL) Lego parts store: (URL) Lego auctions: (URL) Guild of Bricksmiths: (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
(...) I'd love to do this for Pirates (actually, I've mostly done it, I've only got about 150 lugnet.pirate posts not processed (most of the posts aren't directly indexed because they simply point to web pages which are indexed). I've got a lot of (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
(...) I know SOME have but I wasn't clear on whether they have moved from prototype/debug mode to full production. As I suggested before, if you're a curator, you ought to consider modifying your page(s) to say so and give a mechanism to contact you (...) (23 years ago, 5-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
(...) I think the main reason that some of it is so negative (and I'm guilty of that) is that some of the products are plain and simple crap. I've made this analogy before, but I'll make it again. Not telling the LEGO company how bad some of their (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
(XPOST & FUT off-topic.debate) (...) This is a tangent, and I'm not commenting on your analogy. But... 'The bottle of beer in his hand' is *not* the alcoholic's real problem. It's *a* problem, and it certainly needs to be dealt with. But throwing (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | ta ta Jack Stone? (Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet)
|
|
(...) Is there any basis for this, or is it just speculation? (...) The current series actually makes quite a good toy. I think the play value is quite high. I'm just sorry that we largely have Jack Stone at the expense of town. Ultimately, Jack (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ta ta Jack Stone? (Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet)
|
|
(...) I think this was just wishful thinking. :) I know that this is all I want for Christmas. (...) It might make a good toy, but I think it makes a poor LEGO series. Just my opinion; not based on any facts. (...) I think this is the biggest (...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet
|
|
(...) All right..... I'll give you that one. :) I wasn't really thinking the analogy through completely. Regards, Allan (I'm not a LEGOaholic, I just play one on the internet) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: ta ta Jack Stone? (Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet)
|
|
(...) I agree. The parts are mostly poor and a little oversized, but it is a great introduction to Lego. I just wish my youngest kid is a little older... although Duplo is plenty fun too! (...) You mean Jack Stone II? :o Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 7-Nov-01, to lugnet.general)
|
