Subject:
|
ta ta Jack Stone? (Re: Perhaps Lugnet can grow into something better? was: I miss the old Lugnet)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Nov 2001 19:12:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1454 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Joel Kuester writes:
>
> > They seem to be cooling off on that stuff, and they have an amazing classic
> > line running, with more and more high-end master level sets. I think they
> > know what they did wrong, and while Jack Stone may suck *really* hard, I
> > doubt we'll have to suffer its presence long.
>
> The fact that Jack Stone may be retired soon isn't all that comforting.
Is there any basis for this, or is it just speculation?
> What
> I want to know is who was the person that gave the go ahead in the first
> place for this series? I'm serious, I'd really like to know. This series
> clearly looks more like Megablocks than anything LEGO represents.
The current series actually makes quite a good toy. I think the play value
is quite high. I'm just sorry that we largely have Jack Stone at the expense
of town.
Ultimately, Jack Stone may be what the market wants - Lego would be fools
not to meet that demand(?).
Scott A
> Can't
> anyone else see the resemblance of the Jack Stone minifigs to those that
> Megablocks produces?
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
