To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 31234
31233  |  31235
Subject: 
Re: !!!Letter from The Lego Co.!!!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory
Date: 
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:07:16 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
2947 times
  
In lugnet.general, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> > [freeeeky letter snipped]

> And where do they want me to return the letter to?
> There’s no return address…except;        LEGO Systems A/S
>                                           DK-7190 Billund
>                                                Denmark
> You’ve gotta be kidin’!

> > That's really, really, really weird.  I've never even heard
> > of a letter like that going out.  Someone must have typed a
> > 2 when they meant a 3, somewhere, somehow...

What do you mean “Someone must have typed a 2 when they meant a 3?”

> In conclusion, I opened the letter (just like any other letter from Lego)
> expecting to receive a cheque from Lego because of a ‘back-order canceled’
> notice for one of the items I wanted. And then I get this letter!

> > It may have happened if you paid by cheque before you got
> > the items.  Most consumers don't pay by cheque.  Their system
> > may simply have wibbled at it.  (I'm assuming that's how
> > you paid, given that you were expecting a refund?)

Exactly, I always make cheques out to Lego

> P.S. would there be any advantage in pretending to be a retail distributor?
> Would I receive inside product info? (Like advance copies of Harry Potter?)
> I could pull it off. Create a bogus business open up a few mock bank
> accounts…       ;)

> > Actually, if we made an AFOL buying conglomerate, couldn't
> > we make a case for being a company where the distributor =
> > retailer = consumers?

O.k. WoW, you think B.I.G. Lindsay!
That’s a really good idea!
I'll call it “AFOL Conglomerate Ltd.”
You wanna be a partner in our Corporation?
(This is an actual possibility, I have large storeroom that could easily
hold the inventory, and all we’d need is a web page to advertise. Perhaps we
could work directly with Todd and Suz, and sell from Lugnet. Of course,
they’d become associate partners. I could do most of the Legal work and
Networking wouldn’t be a problem because we already know almost all the
facets of the Lego world!)

> > The only downside is that it would
> > then eliminate the support AFOLs provide for the retail supply
> > chain *and* the added margin we give to S@H.

Eliminatin’ the middle-man isn’t that bad!
Toy ‘R’ Us already makes enough money.

>  Lindsay
>  Xpost -> .market.theory, because it's an interesting question

Thanks for replying, I didn’t know if anyone would reply!
I though most people would just look at the post and say “weird” and walk away.
Mayhap there’s another AFOL whose a retail owner of a small Toy store that
can confirm this official letter I've received!

                         Still wonderin’,

                                        --==Richard==--


P.S. can we refrain from using the word ‘weird!’ cause it’s creepin’ me out…



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: !!!Letter from The Lego Co.!!!
 
(...) "Richard's Head-Steppin' Constructions, Inc." Or do they think Canada is a company and not a country? :) (...) That's really, really, really weird. I've never even heard of a letter like that going out. Someone must have typed a 2 when they (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)

12 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR