Subject:
|
Re: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 4 Mar 1999 02:38:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1016 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark wrote:
> ...
> Besides, we have a 15-year old who still loves to play with LEGO, and
> I am nowhere near ready to think of him as an adult yet. :)
Yeah, but as soon as you're 12 or 13, you have to start paying adult
rates for everything. Maybe you could define "adult" as when you start
to buy LEGO for yourself instead of waiting for someone to give it to
you?
Whatever your definition is, I guess I'm an AFOL (I turn 17 tomorrow!).
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
|
| Bram, Welcome to the AFOL'ers (?) , may I be the first to wish you a long and happy life of quality building and enjoyment! Scott Sanburn (Age 23) (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
|
| (...) Happy Birthday! I turned 17 on the 27th, so I am also an AFOL, I guess.. Sad thing is I remember the time I came to RTL 2 and a half years ago and what an idiot I was :) So I would go for the definition to be at least 16+, knowing what I was (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | AFOL (was Re: Is March LEGOFEST kaput?)
|
| (...) Not to disagree with you again, Todd, but... (oh heck, who am I trying to fool? :) I would think that AFOL would refer to people over the age of 16, not 14. Since even TLG's most sophisticated products that I know of do not list any age above (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
