Subject:
|
Re: E-mailed Lego about high prices - got this response:
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 12:48:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
846 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Bill Farkas writes:
> In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > I think that's standard form letter #39
> Here are some snippets of my letter to them:
<snip> (thanks!)
Yep, I'm more convinced than ever it was a form letter, it doesn't directly
mention any of your points or answer them, just gives a stock "why we're
worth a lot" answer.
No one argues that point, we don't mind paying for quality, I think what
most of us have a beef about is that there has been a slide in value for
dollar lately which their form letter does not address at all.
Time for them to update the form letter.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: E-mailed Lego about high prices - got this response:
|
| (...) Exactly. I as much as made the quality argument myself by saying I still had Lego from twenty years ago. (...) I was in TRU the other day hunting clearance sales when a family with two toddlers said, "Oh look, Legos. Do you want some Legos?" (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
