To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 2449
2448  |  2450
Subject: 
Re: 20 year evolution to get to... where we started
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:45:14 GMT
Viewed: 
686 times
  
In lugnet.general, LongJR97@hotmail.com (Jesse Long) writes:
Colin wrote in message ...
To truely see how lego has evolved over the last 20 years compare the
following two sets:

#889 - http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=889
and
#6463 - http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=6463

All I can say is: The more things change, the more they stay the same :-)

I'd take the 889 over the 6463 any day.

Ho hoo!  That's it!  That's the set that 6463 reminded me of, but I couldn't
put a mental finger on it.  The prices are interesting to compare, BTW --
this year's 6463 costs $3.99 for 35 pieces (11.4 cents/piece) and 889 from
20 years earlier cost (I -think-) $1.99 for 25 pieces (8 cents/piece).  Is
40% inflation about right for 20 years elapsed time?  (Not that a price-per-
piece comparison is as meaningful as play value...)

--Todd



Message has 4 Replies:
  Re: 20 year evolution to get to... where we started
 
(...) Well...I don't know about the inflation rate, but also consider that the newer set probably has parts that are more expensive to make - the gold-plated dome thingy and visor [1] for instance. That said, I think my ideal set would be a (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: 20 year evolution to get to... where we started
 
(...) It's on the low side, I'd say, especially considering that there are as lot larger pieces on the new one. (the dome appears to be usefgul in Mindstorms context as a reflecting m,irror for the IR port - haven't tried that yet, tho) jasper (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: 20 year evolution to get to... where we started
 
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) The 40% inflation is actually low. A 3.5% annual rate of inflation would cause a doubling of the price over 20 years. Considering the last 20 years includes 1979,80,81 with double digit inflation rates, I'm (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
  Re: 20 year evolution to get to... where we started
 
Todd Lehman skrev i meddelandet ... (...) Well, in Sweden, the inflation of the last 20 years has been more like 250%, so if it was here, it would _really_ be a price cut! I often use the price of a package of cigarettes as a measure of the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 20 year evolution to get to... where we started
 
Colin wrote in message ... (...) I'd take the 889 over the 6463 any day. Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking for answers? Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! (URL) in Deja News! (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)

18 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR