Subject:
|
Re: The 2001 lineup (list on FBTB)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 19 Aug 2000 08:38:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1296 times
|
| |
|
|
I think this belongs in .general for right now, though maybe it SHOULD be in
.lego.direct.
"Tom Stangl, VFAQman" wrote:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> > As I said before, *don't* take my word for it on something like this. I am
> > not a lawyer. GET yourself a lawyer if you plan to do gray-area stuff, or
> > ask LEGO to clarify exactly what they feel is OK and not OK, so that you know
> > whether you're violating their rights or not. But don't expect a nice neat
> > answer with a bowtie either.
>
> I would argue that their NON-action as to stating their intent/response/feelings
> on the 2001 set info would make them lose their right to say SPIT about it
> anymore. They've had PLENTY of time to respond, and if their lawyers can't draft
> something within HOURS sufficient for posting here, it's time to fire every last
> one of them and hire a new bunch who are at least semi-competent.
>
> I'm starting to lose major faith in TLG's hiring practices - they've obviously
> slipped, shown by the quality of legal responses, PITIFUL website
> design/building/response, non-existent copyright enforcement of 3rd party info,
> etc, etc, etc (many others can fill in other examples here).
>
> If Megablox quality were just 10-20% better, Lego would lose my sizable purchases
> (I'm sure I easily equal 100 "average" Lego purchasers, if not many more) in a
> split second. They have no clue anymore, they aren't listening, they are going to
> bury themselves if they don't WAKE UP AND LISTEN TO THEIR CONSUMERS!
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The 2001 lineup (list on FBTB)
|
| (...) I would argue that their NON-action as to stating their intent/response/feelings on the 2001 set info would make them lose their right to say SPIT about it anymore. They've had PLENTY of time to respond, and if their lawyers can't draft (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
