 | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO) —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | (...) What I want to know is what happened to the now extinct "Biggus Bendyarmicus"? They do share some resemblance to "Technicus Maximus" in terms of size but otherwise this spieces seems to have disappeared even though an occasional arm segment (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO) —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | (...) I could be mistaken, but haven't these appearances involved grey or translucent colored arm segments? (Roboforce) I think these are artifical limbs made of metal, plastic or glass, not biological limbs. On only women have red hair.. maybe the (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO) —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | | | (...) Not so! At least in the mists of antiquity (Castle & Pirates) male 'figs sported red beards and moustaches...the Royal King and the Black Knight are two excellent examples...however they all apparently shaved their heads to make their various (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO) —Craig Hamilton
|
| | | | | (...) hi y'all ~ i recently inquired under luget.FAQ as to what was the first articulated mini-fig. in all of the great responses, i uncovered set #208, (look up the pic; worth a thousand words) which supports my theory that modern mini-figs evolved (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO) —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) I have noted some inconsistencies with your observations below. Perhaps we are working with different population samples? (...) I have noted some exceptions to this - most prominently the female represented <set:6024 here> who is relatively (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | | | (...) I never thought that was a female... Pawel (I think) uses that face for Ewan... or might I be mistaken? -Shiri (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO) —Alex Farlie
|
| | | | | | (...) The lack of smiles may be due to thier spritual concerns. They might consider that thier creator is becoming lazy. <Snipped RANT on Juniorization> (...) heads. In the case of sunglasses this may be due to the fact that Minfigus (Erectus?) has (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO) —Jeff Johnston
|
| | | | (...) Not so! The Royal King and the Black Knight among others are red-haired men. On the other hand, everyone with red hair wears it long...and everyone with blonde or grey hair wears it short! (...) Again, not so...look at the Dark Forest Chick in (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
