Subject:
|
Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 Oct 1998 01:57:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
860 times
|
| |
|
|
Perhaps a Princess.... wrote in message
> "for the people by the people" does NOT necessarily mean "you suck, no
> you suck, not you suck more" ....
I agree completely. What I was trying to say was, the *opportunity* to make
such posts, with no recourse, exits within the Usenet. Not that Usenet or
"for the people by the people"-systems are defined by this type of action.
Simply, this opportunity doesn't exist at Lugnet... and will translate to
less of this type of noise.
> These kinds of systems, though, always depend upon the good nature of
> the participants -- people wanting to follow the rules, treat each
> other with respect, etc.
How long would those who will not "follow the rules, treat each other with
respect, etc." last on Lugnet?
So why would they bother?
LINC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio
|
| (...) "for the people by the people" does NOT necessarily mean "you suck, no you suck, not you suck more" and I think that LugNET news server points this out quite clearly. Mr. Lehman is quite open to comments from everyone -- and he even listens (...) (26 years ago, 15-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
