Subject:
|
Re: STAND BACK! Rob Farver is going to have a heart attack!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Dec 1998 16:40:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1043 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 04:34:08 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lpien@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM.com>
wrote:
> Rob Farver wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Dec 1998 20:41:41 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lpien@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rob Farver wrote:
> > >
> > > <I'm pumped, I bet Gary I is too>
> > >
> > > Ditto. Believe me!
> > >
> > > > I also have a variety of recently old unopen
> > > > sets.
> > >
> > > ?? You mean they used to be new but they recently became old?? :-)
> >
> > Well, when do you consider new sets to be old? I kinda figure since
> > the 1999 sets are out and are "NEW" then anything older than 1999 is
> > now old right? ;)
>
> Ah, a nice philosophical question. I'd say something is NEW if it's new
> this year, CURRENT, if it's still theoretically available and shown as
> part of the product line (Insectoids are CURRENT but not NEW), PHASED
> OUT, if you can find it in the S@H catalogs or on special (Time vomiters
> are phased out) and OLD if it's not available in a box any more unless
> you get very very lucky at MacFrugals or the mystery toy store in Green
> Bay or something.
>
> Helps?
>
>
> PS, I agree with Barry McF.
Ok, then it's probably safe to say Pirates are recently old correct?
They've been pretty well cleared out of all the TRUs and I only know
one store in my area that has a single Pirate set left (Rocky Reef I
believe, at full price, and with the Christmas season of shopping it's
probably gone by now).
Rob :)
+-------------------------------------------+
| Rob Farver - rfarver@rcn.com |
| http://www.farver.com/lego/ |
| http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/rfarver |
+-------------------------------------------+
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
