| |
> Remember all of those small countries that became havens for off-shore
> trusts? They realized that they can attract money simply by being one of the
> best places to put money. Ever wonder why the government does not shut down
> all of the internet casinos? Because they operate in foreign countries that
> not only tolerate them but perhaps benefit from their presence. Oops, I
> didn't mean to preach this much.
Speaking of online casions the easy to eliminate them is for the us government
to just ban ads for online casions. The casinos rely on ads for their customers
and most of the large advertisment providers with the big exposure that the
casinos need are based in the us. problem solved. The casinos go out of business
and everyone is happy.
--
Jonathan Wilson
wilsonj@xoommail.com
http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Can they do like this?
|
| (...) nondeceptive, advertising. To ban speech based upon the content of the speech, the governmental regulation must pass the the the least restrictive method of advancing an important governmental objective (or something like that, I haven't (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Can they do like this?
|
| (...) I guess the answer depends upon the domain name (I waffle just like a real lawyer :)). Clearly www.legos.com and www.lego.org would both be a problem using the "likelihood of confusion" test. Both of those domain names could draw internet (...) (25 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
