Subject:
|
Re: New Throwbots
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Jan 2000 19:07:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
946 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Karl Martinson writes:
> That's the same way I felt, but then i liked them, and then I didn't, and now
> I do! Get it? I'm kinda confused about it all. It's great to see someone
> showing some concern for the throwbots around here. Sure they got the stupid
> arm, but that can go, and then they're pretty cool!
<snip>
I know what you mean. I find the Throwbots a bit like a fungus. At first they
look disgusting, but if you give them a chance they'll grow on you. :)
I agree, the Throwbot arm is pretty useless, but I find the Throwbots just
infatuating because their playability is incredible. They are extremely
flexable and posable, and hold a position very well. I've been doing some
stop-motion animation with some Throwbots recently and the results have been
simply amazing (despite the huge handicap that their feet don't attach to a
baseplate).
Thomas Foote
http://members.xoom.com/thomasfoote/legoindex.html
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Throwbots
|
| The first thing I did with the Throwbots was to buy a zillion 1x1 circular plates ("dots"). If you put a 1x1 dot in the three holes at the bottom of a throwbot foot, they stay on baseplates pretty well. -gyug In lugnet.general, Thomas Foote writes: (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Throwbots
|
| (...) That's the same way I felt, but then i liked them, and then I didn't, and now I do! Get it? I'm kinda confused about it all. It's great to see someone showing some concern for the throwbots around here. Sure they got the stupid arm, but that (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
