 | | Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
|
|
Good idea, but needs a CAD digit, too. James (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I agree. And I seem to remember some talk a while back about creating a Lego geek code parser. For those who don't remember the Lego Geek code, check out: (URL) Main (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Some 2005 sets showing up already in regular stores.
|
|
(...) No I don't think so. Here's a picture of the box: (URL) (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2005, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Some 2005 sets showing up already in regular stores.
|
|
(...) It's not radio controled. I just got one at my TRU, and some of the other 2005 sets. I'll try and get pics or scans up soon. -Dan RUbin (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2005)
|
| |
| | Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Neat idea, but what about those of us who don't stick to any one building theme? I build Town, Train, Technic Scale, Space, Miniland, Adventurers. I don't think I'ved settled into any one theme yet. Would I be a 03xx? -Elroy (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Some 2005 sets showing up already in regular stores.
|
|
In lugnet.general, Richard Morton wrote: SNIP (...) SNIP (...) Out of curiosity I looked at Amazon/TRU for this set. I found something titled: Lego Radio Control Ferrari Enzo (8652) (just go to (URL) and search for "Lego Ferrari") Is 8652 radio (...) (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2005)
|
| |
| | Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
|
|
(...) not bad Gary, I like it. no need to make it official, I'll remember mine, Darren... 0215 (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I like the LEGO Geek Code better, it is more expressive. However it may be a bit harder to decode. (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Kind of a neat idea, for what its worth I would be a 0212. Eric Kingsley (...) (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Identifying AFOLs on LUGNET
|
|
I had this idea last night, and I was wondering if it makes sense (I'm sure I'll hear from pro's and con's). Here it is: What if Lugnetter had a 4 digit code to identify them from a Lego collector perspective. Here's what I mean: 1st digit: (collect (...) (21 years ago, 23-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
