 | | Re: Demographical Question
|
|
(...) Karen and I sidestep this problem by just dumping it all together. This is made easier since (some Technic bits aside) the entire collection is stuff we've accumulated since we've been together -- our childhood troves are held hostage by (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman wrote: (snirp) (...) (snorp) (...) Whatever you do, don't replace the super-awesome Escheristic logo. Further, I'll voice my opinion that the homepage looks just fine and a complete overhaul isn't going to bring (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Demographical Question
|
|
(...) Same with me and my wife. She does get tired of me showing her the same MOC over and over (with 1 piece changed), asking "OK, how does it look now?" Marc Nelson Jr. (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Hi all, I can't offer my html knowledge - it's only poor. But I like to suggest some ideas following up Todd's ideas. An umbrella on a very first level might really be helpful. So users might got the chance to go their way while starting at (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) snip (...) Besides, Susan Rich Green has apologized about this subject on many occassions for the Membership packetts no going as originally envisioned. Give them a break, I have a gut feeling that many of us Lugnetters have forgiven them as (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Change is good sometimes - and seeing that LUGNET hasn't had any major aesthetic changes in a while, perhaps it's time to "freshen up." I have a poor imagination when it comes to dreaming up creative new web appearances, but I know my share of (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Having a hot topics module would be a great addition. Also, the LUGNET Traffic page (link at the top right corner) shows you which groups are hot, but not which topics are hot. The Top Stories is determined using the (member) Spotlight feature (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) We've got something kind of like that over at BZPower too... one of the features that the members really seem to like is "Today's Hot Topics" on the front page. It links to the most posted-in threads of the last 24 hours, updated hourly. There (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Color confusion regarding 4755 Kinght Bus
|
|
(...) I don't expect it to ship like that either. I just said to expect to see a lot of future MOCs looking like that, because that's how they're going to look whenever you make something from the new colors that eventually ship and any bricks that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) What Lugnet should *really* do is keep track of read and unread posts, like a proper newsreader. Even better than a calendar. But that's a major change that's going to take a while to get implemented. Not that there's anything wrong with the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I don't get it. Does Legofan.net have better membership packets? (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: general session starting.
|
|
(...) And that's precisely why he should look here instead, for what EuroBricks is about: (URL) it as a kind of knowledge center platform where newer LUG's can profit and share the experience from the longer established LUG's, for instance in the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.events.brickfest, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) This has been on my list for awhile, I guess I'll speak up... BL has a cool feature for the discussion forum. It has a calender showing posts by date: (URL) I'm out of town for a weekend, it makes it very easy to pick up where I left off. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) I've been a 'member' for a while and I couldn't give a rip for a 'packet'. The pros of LUGNET by far outweigh the "at the time was a good idea but now that it's only Todd and time marches on so, eh, whatrya gonna do?" missing membership (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
(...) Oh please. Todd asked for some constructive input and volunteers to help improve on LUGNET, and you totally sidestep the point of his post and use this as an opportunity to take a pot shot at it. If you want to point out problems, I for one (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
So what was all this about? (URL) have two words to explain why some people are getting disatisfied with LUGNET: "membership packet" (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Digitally Signed Email
|
|
FUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrnc385ha.8ka.....bu.edu... (...) good (...) It's a little silly to say "Simply have all users convince their ISP to change their email infrastructure". I'll (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
Someone brought this up at BrickFest PDX and others agreed it would be an excellent idea: Rather than mainly linking to internal LUGNET resources, the first thing someone should see when they visit the LUGNET homepage is iconic links to other major (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Not just another Mega Bloks vs. Lego article
|
|
(...) DO YOU HAVE TO CREATE AN ACCOUNT? IF YOU DO CAN ANYONE COPY THE ARTICLE AND EMAIL IT TO ME PLEASE? - JEFF (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.quatro, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: repeat of set?
|
|
(...) But, 7212 is not a new set, it came out at about the same time as 4098. They are very similar, but 7212 was originally an airline exclusive. The previous airline exclusives, have AFAIK all been smaller sets so there must be some reason for (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
