 | | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
|
|
(...) Yeah, the whole thing blows. I really hope they don't jump on the Rev. for this. Nobody deserves to get stomped for harmless fun. I mean, I can see how, maybe, you could get ticked at someone for a few of the things on the site, but is it (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
|
|
(...) I wonder if this falls under the "no such thing as bad publicity" banner. I can't wait to see the Reverend's reaction... --Bill. (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
|
|
What is most disturbing about this story is the blatant attempt to link the Brick Testament and child pornography. This article claims that this gentleman was arrested on suspicion of possessing child pornography, then proceeds to give the example (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
Exactly! That is an excellent point Steve. I would think that all the positive reations and media attention Brendon's work has recv'd will stand on it own. Too bad the actions of one perv make other peoples names/work get dragged thru the mud. e (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
I would also add that a review of the 20 Questions article on BimP would shed a whole "lotta" light on the Reverend's view of the bible and it's message. Sheesh...don't journalist do their research anymore? This is simply nuts. Steven (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Poll: Why do you buy LEGO?
|
|
(...) Some other reasons I have bought LEGO: - to see how LEGO tackled a design problem - to acquire parts for trade - to collect the set - because the set is beautiful - because the price was too cheap to pass up - to acquire more tubs for storage (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
(...) I agree completely, I'm no authority but I would suppose that what's in the BT is no more so that in the Bible. That reference was ment to discredit that person in question and the BT was used to paint a futher despicable picture on the back (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers
|
|
Welcome clansmen! I bid you greetings from the ‘Circle of 18 Richards!’ We are a numerous bunch, and soon we will be poised to rule over these fair lands once more. Our high-commander, Richard Marchetti, shall be saluted as ‘post-master’ 1 of 18 (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Help defend the artist! (was Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!)
|
|
I would encourage people disgusted by Fionnula Bourke's article to email their grievance at: icFeedback@mrn.co.uk my response: In your article "Councillor in child porn probe" Dec 29 2002, by Fionnula Bourke, you report the Brick Testament as a site (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
|
|
(...) How true. It always amuses me at how our society "shuns" those parts of the Bible that aren't all holy and pure. Guess what people? You have to deal with the bad AND the good because the original writers are trying to TELL you something (...) (23 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
