 | | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
Well, we didn't finish this, did we? Here is a revised copy of the blurb incorporating all the changes I could find. Do people think with these revisions, it's good to go? -- start -- To fellow RTL'ers: There is another place to share the joy of (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
(...) Point taken, although I see nothing wrong with limiting it just to CLSotW winners, particularly since (with the 3/4 rule) that wouldn't even be a necessary qualification. But allowing the N page alternative, as if that were in some way (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Strange set spotted at Target
|
|
(...) My neighbor is the national rep for one of the major toy companies for the Target chain. Target "Strongly Urges" its major toy suppliers to repackage sets that they may have in excess inventory or that were not good sellers and then sell them (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
(...) Lego (...) After I posted this, I thought of another building criteria that is (IMO) very stringent - as per the above, but using no _more_ than n pieces. (...) want (...) Good question. I don't think it's something that needs 'proactive (...) (26 years ago, 28-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
(...) No, I don't. I agree with you that it should not be merit badge-ish. I tried to address this by a) offering alternatives: N pages OR CLSotW. You can win CLSotW with just one page if it's cool enough. (consider the CNC machine. That site was (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Instructions/catalogs 1968-1973
|
|
(...) You can scan and send them both to ftp.kl.net. For scanning suggestions, take a look at (URL) (I personally suggest scanning them at 150 dpi, with magazine level descreening and auto contrast enabled if your scanner supports it.) I assume you (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | LEGO Quality Observation
|
|
Odd thing I noticed while building #6093, Flying Ninja Fortress [1]. At one point, the instructions have you build a corner which is 3x3, and three bricks high. From above, it looks something like: +-----+ |O O O| +-+---+ |O| |O| +-+ On each level, (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Two new Technic sets - Mini review
|
|
8230 has all stickers. But, 8880 has two screened headlight parts Selçuk (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | 1999 LEGO TECHNIC Catalog 4112685/4112686/4112687-AM
|
|
Andrew Cooperman <cooperman@email.msn.com> has kindly made scans of the new 12-page 1999 LEGO TECHNIC Catalog (4112685/4112686/4112687-AM). Look for the sections entitled: 1999 LEGO TECHNIC Catalog 75 DPI (4112685/4112686/4112687-AM) and 1999 LEGO (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
|
(...) YES! This in fact is what the NMRA Master Modeler has to do... you have to make models of locomotives, of trackside structures, of passenger, and of freights, as well as demonstrate ability to do scenery (Or at least, several of these... I (...) (26 years ago, 27-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
