To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.funOpen lugnet.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Fun / 60
59  |  61
Subject: 
Re: which set?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.fun
Date: 
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 17:39:57 GMT
Viewed: 
3897 times
  
In lugnet.fun, Chris Gray writes:
> 
> My boss, knowing all about my Lego hobby, has said that we should get a
> corporate Lego set to use as a progress indicator. People that complete
> items on their plan will get some number of pieces to add to the model.
> He wants it to be a model that will readily show the progress. I suspect
> it should be one that doesn't have a lot of smaller modules that are
> added to it, since that doesn't show the continuous progress as well.
> 
> So, my question to readers is, which set would you recommend for this
> purpose? My guess is that we can't get away with any of the *really* big
> ones, but we also don't want a super small one, since that won't have
> enough pieces.


Maybe you want to wait for this fall and get the Liberty Statue set.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: which set?
 
(...) But he said he didn't want any really big ones; that one's going to be $200, at least from what I heard. Tim (26 years ago, 29-Jul-00, to lugnet.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  which set?
 
My boss, knowing all about my Lego hobby, has said that we should get a corporate Lego set to use as a progress indicator. People that complete items on their plan will get some number of pieces to add to the model. He wants it to be a model that (...) (26 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.fun)

20 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR