Subject:
|
which set?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:49:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1417 times
|
| |
|
|
My boss, knowing all about my Lego hobby, has said that we should get a
corporate Lego set to use as a progress indicator. People that complete
items on their plan will get some number of pieces to add to the model.
He wants it to be a model that will readily show the progress. I suspect
it should be one that doesn't have a lot of smaller modules that are
added to it, since that doesn't show the continuous progress as well.
So, my question to readers is, which set would you recommend for this
purpose? My guess is that we can't get away with any of the *really* big
ones, but we also don't want a super small one, since that won't have
enough pieces.
--
Don't design inefficiency in - it'll happen in the implementation.
Chris Gray cg@ami-cg.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA
http://www.GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA/cg/
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: which set?
|
| (...) Design your own. That way you get exactly what you want. Since he's paying for them, you can get parts from any of the parts sites and make something that's even company specific - like your company logo. I'v handled corporate requests such as (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.fun)
| | | Re: which set?
|
| I think the better question would be to figure out how many progress "points" your going to have, and then determine whether each "point" will be represented by 1 or more pieces. Then search the database and see which sets fit. My own suggestion (...) (24 years ago, 28-Jul-00, to lugnet.fun)
| | | Re: which set?
|
| (...) Maybe you want to wait for this fall and get the Liberty Statue set. (24 years ago, 29-Jul-00, to lugnet.fun)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
