Subject:
|
Re: RTL query
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:09:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10261 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, Neb Okla wrote:
>
> "Thomas Main" <thomasmain@myrealbox.com> wrote
> > continuing to this day (it is true that the advent of LUGNET
> > drastically cut the number of quality discussions about Lego there,
> > however).
>
> It may have cut the number of total discussions, but your personal
> judgement of "quality" can hardly be considered a "truth".
Perhaps the quality of RTL has gone up lately, now that there are less
people there for the troublemakers to annoy.
> One nice thing about RTL is that it's full functionality is completely
> free to anyone, it is not privately owned, and it has no legally
> binding "Terms of Use".
Yes. It's good to have RTL out there as unconstrained competition.
This forces the lugnet admins to be responsive to the needs of the
community. So please continue to use RTL if you prefer, because it
helps to make lugnet better.
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RTL query
|
| (...) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but I suspect RTL is more of a "wasteland" now than it ever was, at least in my view, based on my (and I suspect a lot of other people's views as well). (I say suspect because I haven't carried out an (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: RTL query
|
| "Thomas Main" <thomasmain@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:HnKvCp.nnL@lugnet.com... (...) cut the (...) It may have cut the number of total discussions, but your personal judgement of "quality" can hardly be considered a "truth". One nice thing (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.faq)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
