| | Re: What do the set numbers mean?
|
|
(...) Generally, they mean quite a bit, but there are a lot of exceptions. The full answer can take days to answer. :) (...) Yeah. (...) No, some are 1 digit, some are 2, some are 3, and at least one is 6 digits (that's the soccer starter set: (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
(...) I'm confused; why/how would <H1> or <H2> be used in the headers? --Todd (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: How can I find information about specific LEGO pieces?
|
|
I know James Jessiman had a fairly extensive (but certainly not exhaustive) database on what parts came with what sets in what colors in what years. I'm not sure if it's still available. As far as a LUGNET project, there is the lugnet.db.inv group (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | How can I find information about specific LEGO pieces?
|
|
Hey all, Is there any way I can find out information about specific Lego pieces? Suppose I wanted to find out if orange 2x2 macaroni pieces were ever sold -- how would I find out if they were? Could I also discover which sets the pieces came from? (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: What do the set numbers mean?
|
|
Sproaticus wrote in message <3739C0CC.93BB046C@g...es.com>... (...) There is an order to the set numbers. 60XX is Castles, 68XX, 69XX are Space, 40XX is boats, and so on. Almost all are 4 digits, except the older sets, which may only be 3 (or 2). (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | What do the set numbers mean?
|
|
Hey all, What is the meaning behind the Lego set numbers? Do they really mean anything? Do certain themes "reserve" numerical series? Are they all 4 digits long? I know they're not all unique. What examples of duplicated set numbers are there? (...) (26 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
|
| | Re: Temporary home for FAQ-In-Progress
|
|
Hey all, I have just slurped Kerry Garrison's Mindstorms and Lego-robotics FAQ, location at: (URL) LUGNET FAQ index: (URL) file of FAQ source, etc.: (URL) - jsproat (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
<MPG.119ea264f27724d...ugnet.com> Distribution: X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Todd: [...] (...) Good! Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Temporary home for FAQ-In-Progress
|
|
Hey all, I have a working copy of the LUGNET FAQ-In-Progress in a temporary home at my Web site. Check it out at: (URL) can download a ZIP file of the raw FAQ data (1) at: (URL) pretty thin, and not very pretty right now -- but hey, it's (...) (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
|
(...) Cool. I concur. (...) Um, I think it was for a possible alternative organization scheme, other than placement in a subdirectory. If we use index files instead, the Location header is not needed. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
(...) Er... the slurpage stage whereupon the headers and body are transformed into HTML. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
(...) I don't understand the difference -- is it just how the text is formatted, or does that number do some magic? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
(...) Parser? As in document validation or transmogrification? (...) Yup, but not in a bad way as long as some sort of backward-compatible non- CSS code (such as <B></B>) were used in combination with <P></P> for section titles. That is, on old (...) (26 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
(...) But don't copy the name 'X-Ref' if you copy the data -- that would be wicked confusing because what you want is a reference to a prior article, and the 'X-Ref' header of NNTP articles *isn't* a reference to a prior article but rather an ID of (...) (26 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
|
|
(...) Nope (...) Why are 'Location' headers useful again? What do they do (as in an example) that an include mechanism (implicit or explicit or a mix-n-match index) can't do? How terrible is life without the 'Location' header? --Todd (26 years ago, 8-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
(...) Independent of the other issue, about representing arbitrarily URLs as Jacob suggested, yes, copying the X-Ref header char for char (anything to the right of the 'X-Ref:' part) is perfectly safe for this purpose. (...) Right now they're not -- (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
(...) SO we just reserve H1 and H2 for the parser? I can live with that. (...) Is the "CLASS=y" attribute part of CSS? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
|
| | Re: Tags
|
|
(...) Heh heh. Well, <H4> is typically the same size as the base font, but in bold, so I don't think anything but <H3> is needed, if that even is. Alternatives to <H3>x</H3> might be <P><B>x</B></P> or [maybe] better yet <P CLASS=y><B>x</B></P>...? (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|