To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.faqOpen lugnet.faq in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 FAQ / *143 (-10)
  Lingo and dialects (Was: Stub error (2002): can't find rtm.exe)
 
(...) Thank you, Jacob, for the FAQ item! :-, Question about the term "catalog": I assume you meant "directory" (or "folder", etc. :-) Is the term "catalog" in use a lot in Denmark? I'm looking at this as a potential language issue. What should I (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Stub error (2002): can't find rtm.exe
 
Hi David, (...) The file "rtm.exe" should be located in your LDraw catalog. If it isn't there you will have to reinstall it from the LDraw distribution. You should also remember that you have to run LDraw and LEdit from the catalog you installed (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
 
(...) At what level would Exclude be in the way? Would you nix all items in the "excluded" file? Would it be selective, allowing certain headers (such as Subject) to remain? What purpose would it serve? Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Progress so far, and a new header
 
(...) Someone's taking cheap snots at my text... :-P (...) Yep. Path of least resistance for now. :-, I have every intention of editing these items, but with only 23 for right now, I'm still getting a feel for it. The FAQ items will be significantly (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Format of FAQ items
 
(...) Verrry nice. I have often wanted something like this for browsing Yahoo!, but it would never crystalize in my mind. If that made any sense. :-, (...) Could you give a formatting option to use a single size fixed-width font, wrapped at, say, 78 (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Working sketch of FAQ item data format
 
(...) Off-the-wall question -- haven't thought about this -- just tossing it out: Would an 'exclude' also be useful in addition to 'include'? (Both are relatively easy to implement.) --Todd (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Progress so far, and a new header
 
(...) SURE!!! --Todd (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Progress so far, and a new header
 
(...) Gesundheit! (...) Dude! All right! (...) In cases like this, it's perfectly OK to correct typos and misuses of trademarks (especially TLG trademarks). That is to say, this question could just as well be re-written as: Subject: What is (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Format of FAQ items
 
(...) Jeremy, Here's what I was chattering about -- here's a little demo of the prototype ng-hierarchy-TOC generator that I use to help visualize the ng layout whenever a question comes up... A top-level overview, going 2 layers deep: (URL) Just the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Who's who in Legoland
 
(...) Ha! Wow. Cool. (...) Yeah, me too. It's just as good as the GIF, for all practical purposes. --Todd (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR