|
|
 | | Weekly FAQ installment, July 2 - July 9
|
| Hi! This is the first weekly FAQ installment. It will consist of two parts every week: 1. A totally new entry to the Commonfolk's FAQ, a humor-oriented Q&A about lugnet. (URL) An already-existing entry from the Acronym FAQ, a list of most (hopefully (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jul-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.general, lugnet.people.newbie) !
| | | | | Re: Randomly generated acronyms (was: Re: The commonfolk's FAQ)
|
| (...) Or maybe on each parent group page, so that would be 52 places. Personally I only go into about 10 of those, so it wouldn't be so bad. KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| Um, there is a link here: (URL) that's in the uncommonfolk's FAQ. Cary "Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@home.com> wrote in message (...) Shiri, You should add a link from the FAQ page to your acronym page. Jude (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Randomly generated acronyms (was: Re: The commonfolk's FAQ)
|
| (...) Yeah.... plus, people wouldn't encounter acronyms directly on the front page anyway! It's the newsgroups where they appear frequently. Still, I'd get kinda annoyed if there was an acronym on every news page. Maybe on the news' front page? (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: help!
|
| (...) Did you check the FAQ before posting? It's visible if you view this page (the front page for the group) (URL) and is often a good place to search for answers. Not all questions are answered of course... Try this entry and see if it helps (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | help!
|
| how do i delete a message I have posted? thanks kai (23 years ago, 29-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Shiri, You should add a link from the FAQ page to your acronym page. Jude (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) That's sounds pretty cool. I would go even farther and have a randomly selected acronym appear on any newsgroup page on LUGNET, say at the top or something. It would be just like the taglines that used to appear on BBS's in "The Old Days". By (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| Hi Eric! Don't apologize for getting off-track - I was just confused whether you misread my post, or I misread yours. ;-) (...) Wow! I like that. Once it got coded, it would be no extra work to post it "every week" or whatever. I think that *in (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Ahem... not to be mean, but yeah, probably. <grin> -Shiri (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Ha. The way I figure it, Larry would feature prominently in about 50% of any "new humourous tidbit" posted weekly. Steve (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) lugnet?" (...) I'll tell you why: * Because we're close. Most of us have met face-to-face, I think. So it's probably true of a lot of the smaller loc's, but LUGNET tends to notice it with Australia.... for some reason. ;-) * Because we don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| Crossposted to admin.general (...) <snip> While I can't take credit for Duane's great idea this is even better than what I was thinking. I was thinking just a post with an allready defined Acronym once a week to keep the visability of the page up in (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Agreed. The idea of posting a FAQ link once a week (if it used some new humourous tidbit so it was a fresh post) to catch the eye of newbies is also good, IMHO. And as far as adding more entries to the commonfolks FAQ... anything to reduce my (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: RGB color values for many brick colors
|
| The original Pantone pallette I used had CMYK values, I translated them via Photoshop for your convience. I assumed in web development (like the colors use on the BricWorx color selector) and most non-print graphic design are done in RGB. SteveB (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains, lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: RGB color values for many brick colors
|
| (...) HSL and HSV are both valid models, IIRC I think they are close but not the same. I forget the difference. I think Luminance (and the entire RGB model too) is more useful or applicable for things that do color by giving off light, like monitors (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains, lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) OK. That's what Eric was suggesting. (...) No no... the reference was not a new *acronym* every week, but a new and humor-oriented entry to the "commonfolk's FAQ", which is more a joke than a real FAQ. I was not even *thinking* of "making up" (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: RGB color values for many brick colors
|
| (...) CMYK is Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, and Black (subtractive color model vs RGB additive color model). CMY gives you a muddled gray/brown so K is added for pure black. Go to (URL) then option 2b, Color Theory for a nice presentation on the topic. I (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains, lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: RGB color values for many brick colors
|
| (...) I'm assuming "CMYK" translates to something along the lines of Blue,Red,Yellow,Black? Or more appropriately "Cyan","Magenta","Yellow",K? (what the heck would K be?) If you had the CMYK values, could these be mathematically translated into (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains, lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad)
|
|
