Subject:
|
Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:46:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3898 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.faq, Duane Hess writes:
> Actually, I think it would be good to post an already defined acronym to the
> main LUGNET page. Sort of an "intro to LEGO". That way new people are aware
> that there are acronyms and a place where they are defined. The current FAQ
> page is a little buried if you ask me.
OK. That's what Eric was suggesting.
> I think a new acronym every week could get difficult after a short time,
> that's why I would suggest recycling old acronyms through every so often.
No no... the reference was not a new *acronym* every week, but a new and
humor-oriented entry to the "commonfolk's FAQ", which is more a joke than a
real FAQ. I was not even *thinking* of "making up" a new acronym every week
(I *don't* make them up - I collect them).
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Actually, I think it would be good to post an already defined acronym to the main LUGNET page. Sort of an "intro to LEGO". That way new people are aware that there are acronyms and a place where they are defined. The current FAQ page is a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
