 | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | (Todd...thanks for starting the ball rolling on this. I was going to wait until BF02 was over before starting discussions, so as to not steal any thunder as it were, but since folks are responding, we may as well move forward anyway. BTW, I did see (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) ?? Did I miss BW 02 ? I thought last year was BW 01? (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) BW (20)03. JAmes (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Thanks. An apostrophe was omitted, then. Correct usage for date oriented appelations is either BW 2003 or BW '03 but not BW 03... as to do that engenders confusion :-) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Thank you for so aptly proving an earlier point about public discussion. 8?| Matt (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) What point was that? If this was sarcasm, it was lost on me, I am afraid. My sole goal is clarity. (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think Matt's point was that he felt that private discussion was best for the planning and organizing....he felt that individuals like you, me, and others (James Brown) are pretty well non participants that wouldn't help the cause.... you may (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | | | (...) I think he means BW 2003, not BW (version/event 3). Just My Opinion, though Ben. (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Todd Thuma
|
| | | | | | (...) The first BricksWest was BricksWest 2002, which would be appreviated BW02 or BW '02. Since this is number one it might be appreviated 01BW02 or #1 BW02 or BW '02 1. The second BricksWest will be BW '03 or #2 BW 03 or BW03 2. I guess the easy (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Todd Thuma
|
| | | | Some friendly comments below... (...) No, you didn't! I haven't heard from you in so long I began to get worried. 8') (...) YEAH! (...) Busy as ever I see. (...) you. (...) I really disagree about making this private. I have no problem with making (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A BricksWest Critique? —Seth Rotkin
|
| | | | (...) I feel that this is a group effort, so Todd is right on the mark here. (...) Agreed! -Seth (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
|
| | | | |
