Subject:
|
Juniorization is (somewhat) good
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Nov 1999 16:57:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
747 times
|
| |
|
|
I actually like the 1*1*6, 1*2*6 and 1*3*6 bricks to use as walls. I like
Burps and the castle walls. I like hollow baseplates.
But what I don´t like is when you make sets which consists to 75% of those
bricks. Those sets are ugly and bad.
Please use the 6-high bricks, but in a resonable amount.
Thanks.
--Tobias
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good
|
| (...) Agreed - those bricks are *OK* as the bricks they replace (1*1*1, 1*2*1, 1*3*1) aren't too uncommon. But not the two-piece palm-trees, the 1*5*5 (?) sloped pieces that used to be made from several 1*2*1 slopes and bricks and all the other (...) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good
|
| Tobias Möller wrote in message ... (...) Fair enough. (...) Bollocks. I can do a hell of a lot more with 18 blocks than 3. And there is nothing I can do with the big bits that I couldn't do with the small bits. Its about creativity, flexibility, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
