Subject:
|
Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 21 Nov 1999 18:26:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
766 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Tobias Möller writes:
> I actually like the 1*1*6, 1*2*6 and 1*3*6 bricks to use as walls. I like
> Burps and the castle walls. I like hollow baseplates.
>
> But what I don´t like is when you make sets which consists to 75% of those
> bricks. Those sets are ugly and bad.
>
> Please use the 6-high bricks, but in a resonable amount.
Agreed - those bricks are *OK* as the bricks they replace (1*1*1, 1*2*1, 1*3*1)
aren't too uncommon. But not the two-piece palm-trees, the 1*5*5 (?) sloped
pieces that used to be made from several 1*2*1 slopes and bricks and all the
other pieces that used to be several interesting pieces; it's almost like
stealing from the customer as we can't modify them or use them differently.
Well, I feel cheated for one!
Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Juniorization is (somewhat) good
|
| I actually like the 1*1*6, 1*2*6 and 1*3*6 bricks to use as walls. I like Burps and the castle walls. I like hollow baseplates. But what I don´t like is when you make sets which consists to 75% of those bricks. Those sets are ugly and bad. Please (...) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
