Subject:
|
Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Nov 1999 03:54:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1001 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> ...a 1x1x6 is much
> sturdier under torsional or shear stress than a stack of 6 1x1s are. So
> it can be quite useful in large structures that have to take significant
> loads, especially dynamic loads (think motorized at the top)...
hmmm.. except.. we all *know* that lego isn't designing these elements to do us
all a favor... helping us to strengthen the structural integrity of our
structures... after all, if it's a large structure and it contains a motor, i
start to think technic... and nothing is more structurally sound than a 1x6
beam mounted vertically via friction pegs into horizontal beams at the base...
then you motorize the top...
i don't see many motors in ninja/castle/adventurers/town...
give me all the little elements.. if i want structure, i'll buy technic
J
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good
|
| I like the big bricks. They are great for pirate stuff! And the big windows, i love those too! (1*4*6) --Tobias onyx skrev i meddelandet ... (...) do us (...) i (...) base... (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good
|
| (...) Agree with the sentiment but slightly disagree on fact. a 1x1x6 is much sturdier under torsional or shear stress than a stack of 6 1x1s are. So it can be quite useful in large structures that have to take significant loads, especially dynamic (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
