 | | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
(...) You know, I get tired of hearing how we live in a capitalistic world. We don't. Not hardly. (if you disagree, take it to off-topic.debate). But even so, this particular seller isn't (apparently) demonstrating much capitalism. LEGO placed a (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) David, I was referring to this: (URL) It walks using a little red micromotor. (...) I was not disagreeing with Orion very hard. There is a scale of reusability, and some parts have a very low reusability score. Orion's point is that there are (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
(...) How about the value of making the market more efficient? Suppose that person A is willing to pay $20 for a set and person B is willing to pay $40 for a set[1]. Perhaps A is lucky[2] and finds the set for $20, but that outcome does not maximize (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
(...) 1. I thought about the PAB. If it were PAB, then we would all know about it and a whole lot of other AFOLs would be doing the same thing. 2. Tent sales would probably mean that they would have to buy whole sets and there's no evidence of them (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
(...) Maybe they've picked them up through Pick-A-Brick or tent sales? The one store listing massive quantities of the Gryffindor shield is in Denmark, and they might have liquidated their leftover stock of light-grey when they switched over to (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
(...) crying souund Ahui hears from the AFOLs crying souund Ahui hears from the AFOLs crying souund Ahui hears from the AFOLs crying souund Ahui hears from the AFOLs We live in a capalistic world and if the market is willing to pay such a price for (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
AFAIK, this seller, NinjaPrincess, is a woman who deals with bulk bought Lego which she sorts and resells. I vaguely recall her having bought some 20,000 copies of Final Duel IIs for $1 each for resale from some clearance/wholesale group. (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Lame Parts contest (was Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down)
|
|
(...) I just went to Yahoo to see what was going on with that link and perhaps getting it reinstated. However, it seems that Yahoo no longer has free webpages for members. I did toss out the idea late last year for another run at the comp, but there (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.space, lugnet.build.contests, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) Dunno about any of the others, but my entry was (URL) this>. Still together, too (mostly). T'was a fun little compo. I'd agree that nearly any part can be used in a creative and original way that has never even been thought of before... (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) Ah, you must mean the (URL) Lame Parts> contest. (...) Don't forget the Throwbot discs... (...) Yeah, Allister did set up a webpage for the winners at one point, but the link he posted is dead. (...) It still pops up from time to time. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) I'm not sure it's the one you're talking about, but I've seen your mini-Vader walker (I'd love to see instructions for that, BTW), and I've also built one MOC that uses it (DTotS was just a one-time modification of a pre-existing MOC): (URL) I (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
Speaking from experience bulk buying of LEGO can be quite economical in that shipping becomes next to nothing, lots of suppliers will discount huge orders, so having 100s or even 1000s of units of LEGO sets is not unrealistic or that strange. We (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.market.brickshops)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) I remember the Stupid Parts building contest a while back. Some of the entries were quite good even though they used such things as the manta ray and the pirate dingy (parts that are commonly thought of as one use only). I Googled it to see if (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Orion Pobursky wrote: <snip> (...) Orion, Have it with Darth Vader's helmet. Its a tough one. I've only seen it in one non-LEGO design. Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 22-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
(...) I just want to point out that Jake was just poking some good-natured fun at me, atleast that is how I took it. I am well known for my pictures of large purchases. In this case, unfortunately, the limits and my lack of funds have prevented any (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...areDOTcom> wrote in message news:Hy2oyM.yyy@lugnet.com... (...) item, (...) (URL) > (...) (URL) (...) but (...) get (...) and (...) way, (...) sell (...) You're (...) be my (...) suckers from (...) Hmmm - (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
(...) Funny, I was looking at that seller's Bricklink store earlier, and thought it odd that he/she is already selling the ships at $140 (15 of them). I can believe 15, just have 2 friends also order their limit of 5 each. Certainly a possible (and (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.market.brickshops)
|
| |
| | Re: ummmm, Limit of 5???? (Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items)
|
|
(...) Yeah I get a bit of a disgusted reaction reading about this. I don't have much of a problem if you wish to get a large quantity (10+), for your own personal use. But getting a huge quantity, with the sole intention of taking advantage of other (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | ummmm, Limit of 5???? (Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items)
|
|
(...) YES! Spotlighted! What this person doing is horrible. It is amazing what greed can do to a person. How did Lego let this happen? I can see getting 15 or so with little or no problem, but OVER 100 of these things? C'mon now guys... lets have (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekly Update of New AuctionBrick Items
|
|
(...) 200 copies? at 200 each? With no mention that you can just ring up S@H and get it yourself? Not very community friendly. Dear LEGO, If you want us to respect the capacity constraints you placed on this set and not try to circumvent them, (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.dear-lego) !!
|
