 | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Krieg
|
| | | Hello, I would like to see: Packets or tubes that contain the correct lubricant for the pneumatic cylinders, pumps, and valves. A female towball pin to fit on an axle. A spool/slider valve for pneumatics. A gear perhaps in various sizes with a round (...) (22 years ago, 17-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: what else could be done —Øyvind Steinnes
|
| | | | | "Paul Krieg" <pdkrieg@epix.net> wrote in message news:HAFwn2.G9t@lugnet.com... (...) I would like to see a electric controlled pneumatic valve. By using a magnet of some kind this can be done. There is some non-LEGO built already but they are too (...) (22 years ago, 17-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Krieg
|
| | | | | | (...) Also a good idea, like a soliniod valve. (...) You can use them to make 6 sided shapes. A lot of the hubs and pulleys have 6 holes so it makes sense to be consistent with this. Also, you can make a 6 sided shape rigid by making equal lateral (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: what else could be done —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | (...) Why on earth do you want those? The only thing I like better is the fact they only use one tube per cylinder, but most times it's not a problem. I'd much rather have longer cylinders in the new style. Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | | | hi when talking about cylinders or pistons maybe 2 way piston would be nice to previously discussed (yes tobbe i should use this word :)) T shape "angle" connector i would add cross shaped definitely dividing by 3 is not too simple by nature of (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Krieg
|
| | | | | | (...) Maybe it's a little selfish of me to say "I want them so I can build more engines more easily". But, if I had them I would use them! They represent the cylinders of internal combustion engines a little better than double acting do. I know it's (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah! Engines! I forgot about that application, sorry! I was rather stunned somebody prefered the old ones :) /Tobbe (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: what else could be done —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | | Geesh, not THIS discussion again :-) Well, I guess it's about time for the "new parts wish list" to come back around for discussion! • Bring back threaded axels in different sizes (I know non-Lego threaded nylon shafts are available, so this is for (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | | | <<snip>> (...) Would that use holes between the studs or right below them? Like this (URL) this (URL) both kinds? Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | | | "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HAJnus.66L@lugnet.com... (...) right below can be done using 1x2 technic bric with 2 holes + 1x1 brick with hole so you know you will never see a coin with value 3 :)) 1x3 brick with 2 holes (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Krieg
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I hope not. Lift arms are great. They will never replace the technic beam in many applications. For one you could not used a technic beam with 2 plates and another technic beam on top and so forth to hold things together verticaly. Regards, (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I was originally thinking holes b/w the studs (for a total of 2 holes), but I suppose a 3-hole (holes right below studs) would be cool too :-) TJ (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: what else could be done —Øyvind Steinnes
|
| | | | "Paul Krieg" <pdkrieg@epix.net> wrote in message news:HAFwn2.G9t@lugnet.com... (...) Just come to think of something.... What about not an T shaped angel connector but a Technic Pin with Stop Bush, not long as the 32054, but only 2L long like the (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
