Subject:
|
Re: More train ranting (sorry)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 31 May 1999 14:54:50 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@AVOIDSPAMctp.iwantnospam.com
|
Viewed:
|
211 times
|
| |
|
|
Eric Brok wrote:
> I said designing *for* trains, not designing *after* trains. :-)
I'm gonna go by what someone else said. Since it appears in at least one
other set in a different theme introduced the same year, not necessarily
designed for the train line.
(In an argumentative mood today)
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: More train ranting (sorry)
|
| (...) In fact, it appears in several non-train sets: 6433, 6435 and 6453. I would say that claiming that it is designed for the train line is a bit controversial. But then again, I don't have the insight in the TLG design process that others may (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jun-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
