 | | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:FzKGvp.5qA@lugnet.com... (...) That's *not* what is happening right now, and its *not* just gripes on our part about how their company is run. Brad Justus came to us last (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Will Lego Learn a lesson?
|
|
(...) I agree on some of your points. I think you could still cycle differnt themes such as 1st year pirates 2nd year ninja 3rd year wild west for an example. This would keep things fresh and at the same time keep introducing sets to established (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) [Warning! Long message!] G'day Tim and other folks, I stumbled upon your post because it appeared on the new-style LUGNET homepage. After reading it, I did a scan of recent postings to this group, and dug up those made by Brad Justus of TLC. I (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Will Lego Learn a lesson?
|
|
(...) something they like, they know they can't wait until they can afford it (which might take months for the 8-12 crowd) because more than likely it will be gone. A short product cycle increases both the urgency of buying new products right away, (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Will Lego Learn a lesson?
|
|
(...) Totally agree with you on this point. All you do when you kill off a theme is fustrate your customers. Why kill off good selling themes like Pirates. Even Wild West sold pretty well and it was way short lived. It looks like Ninja will be (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Add me to the list. I definitely think it's time for some answers. (...) Key words: MUTUAL BENEFIT. We get what we want (better sets, pieces, consumer service (ala Theme Gallery Pics)...and they get what they want, more money. Not because they (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Yeah, the bulk is just remodled parts packs to me, not true bulk. (...) Seem's like it to me... (...) TLC may be seeing it, but I don't think that they understand how many people feel this way and one letter TO THEM instead of to the dear lego (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Exactly right. Progress and cooperation from Lego does not and will not happen until we go outright and state our concerns. It should not have to go this far at all. Lego should be able to recognize out concerns BEFORE we have to tell them (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzJ048.I8r@lugnet.com... (...) maybe (...) teeny (...) deals (...) discount. Yep - at least the current round of bulk is a disappointment, but it can be looked at as a step in the right (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
I dunno. Bulk has actually been a disappointment to me -- there were maybe three items I wanted in the initial offerings (tiles, foliage, and those teeny windows), the rest was overpriced and pointless to me. I have made many deals of late that were (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
