To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 2235
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) And bulk orders are doomed to fail, right? That's what TLC probably thought before the advent of Lego Direct -- presently, demand has exceeded all expectations. (...) Why not? Aren't you asserting it as a fact that they SHOULD acknowledge? I (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) Castle jr. succinctly describes my opinion of the 20 Castle series... (...) Another theme I missed while in college...for the most part...I am happy with the few figs I have, but I dream of a Battrax once in awhile... (...) I am not a train (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) Yeah, in the first month. Let's see what happens in siz months. See if the bulk ordering demands are still that great. Remember that we had to wait for bulk sales a _long_ time. Everybody got psyched up and started buying as soon as bulk sales (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) I've got 5 or 6 (I forget, exactly) already. Who needs more than that? Just sell me the doors and windows and wagon plates and slopes in bulk and I'm fine. Sure, a rereleased metroliner at 150 USD would be nice. But I'd rather see better NEW (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) Uhhhhhh, me? If I found some laying around for $150 or less MISB, I sure would add to the 5 I have ;-) (...) True - I'd MUCH rather have a ton more grey windows and doors WITH glass (my "spare" 37 windows and 9 doors will be used up in no time (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) Isn't the club car door endowed? I forget. But if you mean baggage doors, yes, I agree. (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) I *didn't* know that. JohnG, GMLTC (you can reach me at gmltc_j1 @ yahoo.com ) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
Markassius wrote: <snip> (...) I need to chime in on this one: 6474 ROCKS! The reason: It' isn't that juniorized. Their are separate axle plates, not a one piece body like the juniorized sets. It doesn't have the 1x3 doors, which sucks, but the toe (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) Not paying attention, that's all. Here is a proof for you: 1. You design better sets than TLC does. 2. I design better sets than you do. 3. Therefore, by transitive closure, I design better sets than TLC. QED :=) (this german keyboard is (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) Easy there Lar. This is supposed to be a friendly group where we are forget our differences. Chris Hey, "ptui" rhymes with "GUI"! Sorry, I was amused by the rhyme...I guess I haven't gotten much sleep lately. (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
In lugnet.trains, Christopher Masi writes: yboard is driving me nuts and it is a (ptui!) Mac besides. ) (...) our (...) Yes, the Mac is the computer for the "rest of us" whoever they are! :-). Actually that was the longest I've ever used one and it (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) 1: I would never claim that. I build stuff with *one* idea in mind - realism. I don't worry about piece counts, or difficulty to build, or price points. Lego would probably never use one of my models as a "set", because they would be too (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
 
(...) Right on, brother. (...) Oh, and Dan Siskind (who is also a better designer than TLC... for adults) does? (...) Well, you just proved #1, not that it needed proving. :-) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Smackdown: J-1 vs Lar (was:Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?)
 
(...) Maybe not enough substance to qualify for .debate, but I would give the nod to J-1, because he has braved 8wide waters! Sorry Lar, but you are about 2 studs short....or should I say narrow>;^D -John (J-2) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR