To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 1697 (-10)
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) Except I am expecting that there will always be a large number of parts which will not be offered through bulk sales. I don't remember the exact number, but between all the product lines (if that's the right term -- System, Technic, DUPLO, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: fan support
 
Dear LEGO, I think every AFOL does have influence on the company, although not necessarily as much as Stephen did with these sheets. Well, whenever I am checking a toy store for new LEGO sets (at least once a week) then there is someone else who is (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) How many motors do you think you'd need to pull that? <G,D&R> James (URL) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) John Neal won't stop until he's working in 12"=1' scale... ;-) JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:38BC1E99.39A872...est.net... (...) With us[1] discussing the possibilities of running 8 wide trains, one would think we would hear a different tune from you, John "I can't build better, so I (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Gary Istok (<38BBF30F.5B5ABBE@umich.edu>) wrote at 16:25:52 (...) From a commercial pov, the overheads on distributing to 20 people have got to be less than doing it for 80, so I know what I'd be tempted to do. But then again, (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Steve Bliss (<ld7obsggkqkh3cuh77...kh1hsj2@4a x.com>) wrote at 19:38:49 (...) Or we could do it. I can see the potential for cooperatives/syndicates being set up to buy the bulk volume that LD will want to sell, and then (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) <major snippage> (...) I think this would be a successful product. This would be a fun idea for children and adults. My son loves the trapdoors and anything else that is hidden or a surprise in a LEGO set. And adult fans might find some useful (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) Right. BUT, I'd also like to see a low-volume purchase option, where we (the insane) could purchase any current parts which aren't availble in service packs (or bulk purchase). This would be buying in small volumes, for a premium unit price (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: an update -- and an apology
 
(...) UNLESS we could get better doors. The 1x4x6 door frames and doors (used in the McDonald's Restaurant) would be very nice to have, IMHO. (...) (25 years ago, 29-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR