Subject:
|
Re: Peeron Guidelines
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:33:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
546 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:19:34PM +0000, TWS Garrison wrote:
> I'd like to echo the above sentiments. Most of us are unlikely to find MISB
> sets from 1980, but it would still be nice to have an inventory. . .and know
> that the inventory was not as reliable as one from an MISB set. (For example,
> I bought a huge number of old Space and Town sets at a garage sale this weekend
> and I doubt the most of them are inventoried, but the parts were mixed
> together, so any inventories I were to do of them would be "from
> instructions".) Listing the source of the inventory would also be a way for
> people to judge whether or not they should verify an inventory. I would
> recommend categories of: MISB or equivalent, catalog or box*, instructions, and
> other.
right, good idea.
> And, a side note, I would like the Admins to consider changing the charter of
> .db.inv to allow discussion. There really isn't any other place that's
> appropriate for discussion of inventories in general (sometimes .db.brictionry.
> . .), and it would be confusing to invent a new newsgroup for that purpose.
or at least make a .db.inv.discussion? and have posts to db.inv
auto-followup there?
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Peeron Guidelines
|
| (...) I'd like to echo the above sentiments. Most of us are unlikely to find MISB sets from 1980, but it would still be nice to have an inventory. . .and know that the inventory was not as reliable as one from an MISB set. (For example, I bought a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
