Subject:
|
Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Nov 1999 03:00:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
870 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.db.inv, Kim Toll writes:
> I'd say no, there's no standard.
> For my inventories, I just count the parts for the whole set. [...]
I follow all the "hints" given on the page http://www.lugnet.com/inv/ as if
they were a standard, even though they aren't (-:
> This may not be quite anal enough for some people, but I haven't
> figured out a good reason to separate out the individual bags or
> boxes in my counting. [...]
I pretty much agree, in that I can't figure out any really "good reason" for
the practice, but I do it anyway because it's in the hints. Maybe Todd thinks
it's important for the secondary parts market (see
http://www.lugnet.com/admin/plan/ and http://www.lugnet.com/admin/plan/3a.html
)
> Also, Robert, since you count parts packaged in separate boxes, what to you
> do about Town Jr. sets where each unit comes in a separate polybag? Do you
> count each polybag seperately? Just curious.
What's a Town Jr. set? (-: NO, just kidding! I know what a Town Jr. set is --
but I've never bought one. I have only ever bought Star Wars, Technic,
Mindstorms, and buckets.
- Robert Munafo www.mrob.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
| Robert Munafo wrote in message ... (...) this: (...) ... (...) ... (...) sub-box (...) the (...) the (...) inventory (...) I'd say no, there's no standard. For my inventories, I just count the parts for the whole set. That's the compromise I made a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
