Subject:
|
Question on 8277 Inventory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:27:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
423 times
|
| |
|
|
I have a quick question on how to inventory set 8277, the Giant
Model Set. Since the set contains a sub-box should the pieces in this
box be inventoried seperately from the rest of the box? If so, what
should designate these pieces as still coming from set 8277 but from a
sub-box. I am just starting to get a database set up and only have
about 6 smaller sets invetoried so far. I would prefer not to add too
many fields. Maybe calling the set number 8277a or 8277sub would be
sufficient. Is there any standard for this??? By the way I have
managed to find inventories for all the sets I have done myself so far
and all are in total agreement. This is great!!! I seem to have
adopted Robert Munafo's piece naming scheme for my database as it
appears to be the most complete, compact and sensible I have come across
so far.
Any thoughts welcome,
Robert Gaunt
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
| I ran into that problem too, and the solution I came up with looks like this: 7171 Names: Mos Espa Podrace Inventory: by "John Cromer" <cro@astro.caltech.edu> Count Color ---ID--- Description 1 n/a 7171-sa1 Subassembly box, Anakin's Podracer (...) (25 years ago, 18-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
