Subject:
|
Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 22:10:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
475 times
|
| |
|
|
I ran into that problem too, and the solution I came up with looks like this:
7171
Names: Mos Espa Podrace
Inventory: by "John Cromer" <cro@astro.caltech.edu>
Count Color ---ID--- Description
1 n/a 7171-sa1 Subassembly box, Anakin's Podracer (7171-sa1)
1 n/a 7171-sa2 Subassembly box, Gasgano's Podracer (7171-sa2)
1 n/a 7171-sa3 Subassembly box, Sebulba's Podracer (7171-sa3)
1 n/a 4129022 Instructions, 4129022
7171-sa1
Names: Anakin's Podracer (Box 4128173-1/3):
Inventory: by "John Cromer" <cro@astro.caltech.edu>
Count Color ---ID--- Description
2 black 3020 plate, 2x4
6 blue ld3941 brick, 2x2, cylindrical
(etc... lots of lines left out here)
7171-sa2
Names: Gasgano's Podracer (Box: 4128174-2/3):
Inventory: by "John Cromer" <cro@astro.caltech.edu>
Count Color ---ID--- Description
4 black 3700 beam, 1x2
(etc... lots of lines left out here)
and so on... you get the idea.
I consider the "sub-box" to be a "component" of the complete set. The sub-box
gets its own inventory, and the software that handles the data can combine the
sub-boxes into a single inventory or not, at its choosing.
By the say, the "sa" in "7171-sa1" stands for "subassembly", a term used in the
administration of assembly-line manufacturing. John Cromer did the inventory
for set 7171 and provided the box numbers including the "1/3", "2/3", etc.
I didn't need to add any fields to my database format. My software just scans
through the data file (a plain text file!) for a line that consists of the
desired set number; then all following lines until the first blank line are
part of the inventory for that set.
- Robert Munafo www.mrob.com
In lugnet.db.inv, Robert Gaunt writes:
> I have a quick question on how to inventory set 8277, the Giant
> Model Set. Since the set contains a sub-box should the pieces in this
> box be inventoried seperately from the rest of the box? If so, what
> should designate these pieces as still coming from set 8277 but from a
> sub-box. [...]
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
| Robert Munafo wrote in message ... (...) this: (...) ... (...) ... (...) sub-box (...) the (...) the (...) inventory (...) I'd say no, there's no standard. For my inventories, I just count the parts for the whole set. That's the compromise I made a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Question on 8277 Inventory
|
| I have a quick question on how to inventory set 8277, the Giant Model Set. Since the set contains a sub-box should the pieces in this box be inventoried seperately from the rest of the box? If so, what should designate these pieces as still coming (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
