Subject:
|
Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Nov 1999 20:24:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
478 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.db.inv, John Cromer wrote:
> (Haven't been posting much lately for a variety of personal reasons,
> but mainly for this group -- I'm not part-number savy yet. I have
> lots of inventories I've done for my own personal use but I've never
> had much use for part numbers, using them only for parts that are
> obviously difficult to describe. The folks who participate in this
> group seem to want them on everything, so I've been reluctant to post
> until I get the numbers included. But so anyway ... I'm working on it.)
I'd rather have the inventory listings, without the numbers, than not have the
listings at all. Anyone who is going to use other people's inventory lists is
going to quickly get used to having to translate heavily.
I was working on an inventory database/application for awhile (and I probably
will again, if I ever do another parts-sale). A key feature of the application
was importing/translating other people's data.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Question on 8277 Inventory
|
| I pretty much follow the "hints" found on Todd's LUGNET inventory page: (URL) Number #8 If they are boxed separately, I inventory them separately, but in general, I don't keep track of individual bag contents. (Haven't been posting much lately for a (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
