Subject:
|
Re: What words describe the Lego elements?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.brictionary
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Feb 2000 17:35:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3410 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.db.brictionary, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> 1 - or if you are a creationist, they classify successfully AS IF they
> were related, whether they actually are or not can be considered by you
> to be an open question without distracting from the success of A
> Linnaeus's(2) work at organising fauna and flora.
>
> 2 - no doubt I incorrectly spelled the poor man's name...
Nope, "Linnaeus" is spelled correctly. However if the "A" above refers
to his first name that's wrong, his first name is Carolus. If not,
nevermind.
-Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What words describe the Lego elements?
|
| (...) Respectfully disagree. Animals are all related (1), and the nomenclature, driven by the Linnaeus classification system, reflects that relationship. Lego elements, except in limited cases, are not related to each other by derivation or (...) (25 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
