| | Re: Robolab 2.5.0 -> 2.5.1 ???
|
|
Mike, As recommended by others in this thread I contacted Lego Dacta and they sent me (free of charge) a CD-ROM with the 2.5.1 upgrade on it. This can only be applied to an installed copy of 2.5.0. I have not found the 2.5.1 upgrade anywhere on the (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | Robolab 2.5.0 -> 2.5.1 ???
|
|
I grow confused about all this. Can you tell me how to get 2.5.1 from a patch/update off the net? Alternatively, can you tell me who to contact in the UK (or for the UK) to get the update files please? Mike Reddy, Senior Lecturer -- Web: (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: Lego Designer Software
|
|
(...) Lego Designer 1.0 works amazingly well for a first version. It's Help can get you started. It has a few problems and could use some more tips. Let me know if you want my long list of problems and suggestions sent to Pitsco several months ago. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.edu, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
(...) Matthias I am curious. Were you able to order products from Spectrum from outside of Canada? Did they ship to you in the US? Thanks (22 years ago, 14-Sep-02, to lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: FW: updating Robolab 2.5 - Some testing
|
|
Bill, Thanks for this update. Colin: I emailed Deanna Newell at Pitsco and got a reply back today from Tim Lankford <tlankford@pitsco.com>. He indicated that Deanna has been promoted and that he is now in charge of customer service regarding (...) (22 years ago, 21-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | RE: FW: updating Robolab 2.5 - Some testing
|
|
Hello Colin, In order to get this CD-ROM for 2.5.1 I called Deanna Newell at Pitsco. She was on vacation and they transferred me to some very friendly tech support people. To make a long story short, I pointed out all the patches that need to be (...) (22 years ago, 18-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: FW: updating Robolab 2.5 - Some testing
|
|
I have Robolab 2.5.0 and I tried to install SP1. The install says that 2.5.1 is required. It then searches for 2.5.1 on your disk. In my case it said 2.5.1 found and updated the software. Robolab now no longer works! This seems to suggest that you (...) (22 years ago, 18-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | FW: updating Robolab 2.5 - Some testing - part 2
|
|
Hello All, A small update The "Fixes CLI vis in Pilot mode" dated 7-17-2002 to be applied to 2.5.2 is incorrect. It must be applied to Robolab 2.5.1. That is the error I received when I tried to apply to Robolab 2.5.2. Tufts hopefully will upgrade (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | FW: updating Robolab 2.5 - Some testing
|
|
Hello Miles and all, Here is what worked for me on the upgrade process: Number 1.) Robolab 2.5 basic release Number 2.) The CD-ROM 2.5.1 from Pitsco overlaying the 2.5 release Number 3.) Service Pack 1 applied. My version is now 2.5.2 The SP.1 text (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | RE: updating Robolab 2.5
|
|
Hello Miles, After all the help you have been to me in the past I am happy to help you. About two months ago I received a CD-ROM from Pitsco with the label 2.5.1 on it. The instructions were very simple "Overlay everything in the current Robolab (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | updating Robolab 2.5
|
|
Need your help understanding why and how to update Robolab 2.5. Tufts offers Service Pack 1 for Robolab version 2.5.1 at (URL) . What should owners of version 2.5 do ? Does 2.5 need the updates in Service Pack 1 ? How do owners of version 2.5 update (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
(...) A myth indeed! I too have ordered from Spectrum and received prompt and courteous service. I got what I wanted within days of ordering it. They were quite helpful (and patient) in locating part numbers, even though I was reading from a Pitsco (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
|
|
"TWS Garrison" <tgarrisBASSo@ISmath...urdue.edu> wrote in message [ ... snipped ... ] (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I have only ordered from Pisco twice but both times were pretty straight forward. Call them up, tell them I want items such and such and (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
(...) Really??? that is one of the most often used metaphors for an exercise in futility. From the The Oxford Dictionary of Modern Quotations: "I'm not going to rearrange the furniture on the deck of the Titanic." --Rogers Morton (URL) Ford's (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
|
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
(...) I agree. I have had no trouble ordering online from these guys. They are just like any other online retailer. Red and blue technic beams, gears, motors etc. A bit pricey, as has been pointed out, but if they are the only source, you gotta do (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
I'm not sure, but I think this thread has now had more name changes than a dead LEGO product line. ;) (...) Name changes (after 20+ years of being in use) are a silly exercise. For anyone who's ever known it as such, it will always be DUPLO. And why (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)
|
|
| | An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
(...) yeah, I'm aware of the name change, but for some reason I refuse to adopt it. ..chock it up to nostalgia. and too long of a name. I still say SYSTEM, DUPLO and TOOLO too. (...) lol. that's not funny, but it made me laugh. never heard that (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
|
|
(...) Well, technically DACTA is already as dead as the DUPLO, err, dodo: (URL) middle of the page announces the DACTA is now "LEGO Educational Division". This press release raises three interesting questions: 1) Is this rearranging the deck chairs (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta)
|
|
| | Re: Generate LASM Cmd?
|
|
The text box to wire to the LASM Cmd connector on the Generate LASM cmd.vi can be found in the Internet menu under Functions. The commands in this pink bordered box can be entered with the text tool. (22 years ago, 28-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.edu)
|
|
| | Generate LASM Cmd?
|
|
Has anyone figured out how to use the Generate LASM Cmd in Robolab 2.5? Help says: Simply wire in the lines of text into LASM Cmd and have the Begin and End wires on either side. But how is that done? I cant find a text tool that will produce (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.edu)
|