 | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
|
|
(...) Maybe the cross-posting was an (unsuccessful) attempt to get around the new (URL) Spotlight settings> that discriminate against posts in .color. The (URL) petition post> has 8 spotlights, but does not show up in the Spotlight sidebar. Perhaps (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) Bingo! Thanks Steve. (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
|
|
(...) Whereas I agree everyone should have the right to express thier opinion--that said, the 'spamming' of every major NG at LUGNET was, in my humble opinion, taking that 'chip on the shoulder' just a tad too far. Post colour issues in colour, and (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestions required for medium sized sets with lots of grey
|
|
(...) SNIPPY of list Hello Steve (And others), Thanks a lot! I really appreciate this. I guess I should have mentioned that I was looking for regular parts (like 1 x x etc) too. But this was still a great help. Legoswami Samarth (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
|
|
(...) The whole reason Todd set up a Color newsgroup was so there would be a place for people to discuss the Color issue ad nauseam. (...) Come on, man. You've met me. I'm not a hostile person. The whole "Boo hoo, I'm not going to read Lugnet (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) Disagree - because I can NOT pretend to know how to run a multi-billion(?) dollar company that has existed longer than I have. Steve Hassenplug (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Technic Pin 1/2 (part #4274) blue ?
|
|
(...) I completely agree with Jennifer's statement, we like the colours when it suits us, but not when it doesn't. Unlike bley, I think this is a problem that only creeps slowly into the minds of technic builders as we can slowly deplete our stocks (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.parts, lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
|
|
(...) Just two points: a) The issue seems to be important enought to pop up again, and again, and again. If the topic was unimportant, it would have died by now. b) if you avoid LUGNET, how did you manage to answer anyway? Disagreeing with other (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Technic Pin 1/2 (part #4274) blue ?
|
|
"Steve Dunn" <s%te#ven.j&.du?nn*@...tr$a.c?om> wrote in message news:IAJKnu.oHo@lugnet.com... (...) I have some of these in white... very handy too. (...) peices (...) obvious. Agreed, I like the variety of colour that this has introduced, but do (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.parts, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) The end of this para should read: "That's because LUGNET doesn't censor." (hit send too early, sorry!) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
